House Prices - Who Loses? Who Wins? Let's take a look at it.
The need to defend ourselves from the Dirty Duo of bankers
and politicians has never been more urgent. In this article I
give a few examples of their deception and why in order to
prosper it is necessary to think outside 'our rulers' prescribed
investment and career paths.

The average Briton, we are told, has approx. 1,000 pa
(2.73 per day) disposable income, (the amount left after
everything is paid); all my life it has been quoted at much the
same percentage. If that figure ever increases house prices
immediately increase to take it up. Why? Because a roof over
ones head is an absolute essential, a reality that is always
mercilessly exploited by speculators and money lenders.

Rising house prices have, to first time purchasers, has always
been a cause of endless misery to the working and lower
middle classes, indeed it could be said that it helps to create
the underclass. So, the first part of the title question is
answered.

Keeping an efficient work force and civil disorder is a balancing
act of great skill of which the bankers are the experts and not the
politicians. It is the banks and not the politicians who employ
millions of people and lend billions of pounds, earning untold
billions, (second part of title question answered). If house prices
should not rise at the required rate bankers lackeys, the politicians
of course, allow another immigration flood to put pressure on the
housing supply with no regard whatsoever for the resident
population. Food for thought that leads us once again to the
bank/ politicians partnership.

Some British politicians are as insane as they are naive. We have
one who likes to bleat "I want to change the world" the very words
written on the grave of Karl Marks in Highgate Cemetery. What
business has such a person being a representative of British people,
when he wants to change the way people think rather than promote
their desires as he was voted in to do? We've got another one who
introduced a tax on pension investment which ten years later has left
millions of pensioners, who would have been comfortable, living in
near poverty. He also sold half of our gold reserves at the bottom of
the market, something that every first year economics student knows
never to do, costing us billions. I wonder who bought the gold!
Let's see who employs him when he retires from politics! Is
it any wonder that the banks are so powerful?

Voters are rewarded for 'not thinking' and for wasting 30 years of
priceless daylight hours by being allowed to pay for somewhere to
sleep securely in their old age. There is a lot to be said for security
but does it have to take thirty years of drudgery? Only those who
can think for themselves and seek to improve their lot and that of
their families will get out of the trap.

People working solely on linier incomes will live a permanent struggle.
Honest decent hard working people for the large part and most
survive because they keep struggling. The illusion of ownership
keeps them going till the day they die.

If we compare our lot with that of the third world, where life expectancy
is just a few decades we could consider our selves to be winners.
If we compare out lot with that of 'our rulers' we must consider
ourselves losers. So, let's not accept drudgery when with effort our
lives can be immeasurably improved because we do not all have to
be average.

Living within the capitol economic system we all have the opportunity
to improve our lot, few will see it or take the step away from the norm
which is very much to the advantage to those of us who do.

Those who aspire to attain residual income either by starting their
own business or acquiring a second source of income are the ones
who will escape the rat race and unlike some of our politicians can
be proud of them selves.

Observe how many retired senior politicians receive advisory
posts and directorships from banks, where their disposable income
is considerably more than 2.73 per day, not to mention 'expenses'.