Google Penalty - How Terribly Created And Promoted Articles Punish Your Reputation Or Image
A Google penalty is a penalty that no business individual engaged in advertising campaigns ever wishes to deal with.
It is simply the demotion of a niche site's rank in Google's search engine results page (SERPS).
The most horrible situation is usually a Google penalty that totally eliminates your web site from Google's directory.
It can happen to you because of a variety of reasons, ranging from link farms to identical content violations.
How are article authors suffering from the Google penalty? There are many article services around claiming that you'll receive a "lot" of traffic and rank higher in the search engines if you employ them.
You pay for their service & they write down articles which are then distributed to various article directories.
However, when your articles begin all over Google, the content of that article is identical on numerous other websites.
Just about all of the sites your content pieces are promoted to are completely filtered from the index.
This is because of duplicate content.
The duplicate content penalty is considered by some people a scheme that marketers use to promote article spinning programs.
Business owners have argued that as soon as newscast web pages publish articles, they stick.
Therefore, opposing sides believe that duplicate content filtering doesn't really exist.
Unfortunately for them, Google has their own rules strongly against aggressively repeated and reused web page content.
Articles are not excused by those regulations.
How is identical content detected by Google? On this stage, only a hypothesis may be expressed.
Logic should also be exercised as well.
It is fact that high-quality content on one web page that's indexed first will hardly ever deal with any duplicate content filters.
It is also proven fact that various news broadcast distribution websites have the exact articles seen on hundreds of other Internet news sites and stay indexed with Google without being blocked.
The main reason is because of the amount of unique content on a website.
There are millions of web sites getting indexed plus 1000's extra being written as you read this article.
Therefore, there is a high chance that a chunk of your content can by coincidence match another website.
Does this signify that the duplicate content alert will be raised by Google & crush this site? No.
The website will be reviewed using all content on that web page with the similar content that can be found on another internet site.
To illustrate, an article may be put on a site with a great deal of content that the featured article makes up merely 5% of the remainder of the information on that web site page.
If ever the article is a reproduction represented on scores of other internet websites, that means that barely 5% on the offending page's content is duplicated while the remainder is 95% unique.
Therefore, it is likely to stay indexed through Google.
On the other hand, there are lots of article directories where 95% of the data of that page is just the published article.
When Google finds that 95% of the web page is an article found on several other internet sites, it is more likely the web page holding that article is going to be removed from the index of Google.
Trusted (high page rank) sites usually can keep the article indexed.
Other than that, all other websites that have high percentages of duplication run the risk of an identical penalty.
How are news syndicate sites staving off that possible Google penalty? Those news syndication websites apply only a small portion of the article & generally give a back link to the original web page honoring the original writer of the article (or they will charge customers a subscription fee to get access to the article over a sheltered account and pay the writer a commission).
The news syndication website wins by using just a small portion of the article's data that can still be reviewed as unique content, while the rest of the duplicated article content is stored in another area.
Once seasoned article marketers began to protest against article service writers & submitters for promising that gush of traffic that never came since those articles were getting filtered forcefully from Google's index (as a result of duplications), they launched what is called article spinning software.
This was mostly in the form of software which is depended on to alter the synonyms of articles for every directory the article is circulated to in order for it to look unique.
Sorry to say, article value suffered when the articles were reworded.
Numerous articles that were "spun" worked in being "unique", but appeared like they have been rewritten either by Kindergartners or people with insufficient knowledge of the English language.
In lots of scenarios, article service providers are recognized to outsource to foreign publishers with awfully weak writing skills due to their dirt cheap costs.
People who entrusted their article marketing to those services do nothing more than scrutinize their reputation and organization by attempting to do difficult work the easy way.
Article sites started to be wise towards the trick, terminating article writers showing poor quality articles and go as far as to report them sometimes.
Is investing in a service that rewrites articles to avoid a Google penalty a bad suggestion? No.
It is just very important to make sure that your rewritten articles still have the same quality that your primary articles should have.
Promising that the reproduced articles will be unique shouldn't be enough.
Promising that "the reproduced articles will still make sense to humans" will not be enough, either.
Still, if an editorial service claims you'll get a "stream" of traffic just through circulating SEO articles to article directories without doing anything else, make sure you choose a company or individual SEO expert that could socially syndicate your articles.
This is the only way how your articles will rank higher in the search engines.
It is simply the demotion of a niche site's rank in Google's search engine results page (SERPS).
The most horrible situation is usually a Google penalty that totally eliminates your web site from Google's directory.
It can happen to you because of a variety of reasons, ranging from link farms to identical content violations.
How are article authors suffering from the Google penalty? There are many article services around claiming that you'll receive a "lot" of traffic and rank higher in the search engines if you employ them.
You pay for their service & they write down articles which are then distributed to various article directories.
However, when your articles begin all over Google, the content of that article is identical on numerous other websites.
Just about all of the sites your content pieces are promoted to are completely filtered from the index.
This is because of duplicate content.
The duplicate content penalty is considered by some people a scheme that marketers use to promote article spinning programs.
Business owners have argued that as soon as newscast web pages publish articles, they stick.
Therefore, opposing sides believe that duplicate content filtering doesn't really exist.
Unfortunately for them, Google has their own rules strongly against aggressively repeated and reused web page content.
Articles are not excused by those regulations.
How is identical content detected by Google? On this stage, only a hypothesis may be expressed.
Logic should also be exercised as well.
It is fact that high-quality content on one web page that's indexed first will hardly ever deal with any duplicate content filters.
It is also proven fact that various news broadcast distribution websites have the exact articles seen on hundreds of other Internet news sites and stay indexed with Google without being blocked.
The main reason is because of the amount of unique content on a website.
There are millions of web sites getting indexed plus 1000's extra being written as you read this article.
Therefore, there is a high chance that a chunk of your content can by coincidence match another website.
Does this signify that the duplicate content alert will be raised by Google & crush this site? No.
The website will be reviewed using all content on that web page with the similar content that can be found on another internet site.
To illustrate, an article may be put on a site with a great deal of content that the featured article makes up merely 5% of the remainder of the information on that web site page.
If ever the article is a reproduction represented on scores of other internet websites, that means that barely 5% on the offending page's content is duplicated while the remainder is 95% unique.
Therefore, it is likely to stay indexed through Google.
On the other hand, there are lots of article directories where 95% of the data of that page is just the published article.
When Google finds that 95% of the web page is an article found on several other internet sites, it is more likely the web page holding that article is going to be removed from the index of Google.
Trusted (high page rank) sites usually can keep the article indexed.
Other than that, all other websites that have high percentages of duplication run the risk of an identical penalty.
How are news syndicate sites staving off that possible Google penalty? Those news syndication websites apply only a small portion of the article & generally give a back link to the original web page honoring the original writer of the article (or they will charge customers a subscription fee to get access to the article over a sheltered account and pay the writer a commission).
The news syndication website wins by using just a small portion of the article's data that can still be reviewed as unique content, while the rest of the duplicated article content is stored in another area.
Once seasoned article marketers began to protest against article service writers & submitters for promising that gush of traffic that never came since those articles were getting filtered forcefully from Google's index (as a result of duplications), they launched what is called article spinning software.
This was mostly in the form of software which is depended on to alter the synonyms of articles for every directory the article is circulated to in order for it to look unique.
Sorry to say, article value suffered when the articles were reworded.
Numerous articles that were "spun" worked in being "unique", but appeared like they have been rewritten either by Kindergartners or people with insufficient knowledge of the English language.
In lots of scenarios, article service providers are recognized to outsource to foreign publishers with awfully weak writing skills due to their dirt cheap costs.
People who entrusted their article marketing to those services do nothing more than scrutinize their reputation and organization by attempting to do difficult work the easy way.
Article sites started to be wise towards the trick, terminating article writers showing poor quality articles and go as far as to report them sometimes.
Is investing in a service that rewrites articles to avoid a Google penalty a bad suggestion? No.
It is just very important to make sure that your rewritten articles still have the same quality that your primary articles should have.
Promising that the reproduced articles will be unique shouldn't be enough.
Promising that "the reproduced articles will still make sense to humans" will not be enough, either.
Still, if an editorial service claims you'll get a "stream" of traffic just through circulating SEO articles to article directories without doing anything else, make sure you choose a company or individual SEO expert that could socially syndicate your articles.
This is the only way how your articles will rank higher in the search engines.
Source...